【后现代史学批判】英文范文详解

Postmodernism fundamentally destabilizes traditional historiography by dismantling the Enlightenment faith in objective truth, linear progress, and universal grand narratives. By reframing historical accounts as inherently textual constructs rather than transparent reflections of reality, scholars emphasize the rhetorical strategies and ideological frameworks that inevitably shape archival interpretation. This epistemological shift exposes how marginalized perspectives were systematically silenced by dominant metanarratives, thereby compelling historians to interrogate the nexus between knowledge production and institutional power. Consequently, contemporary historical practice has evolved toward a critical reflexivity that rigorously acknowledges narrative subjectivity while maintaining fidelity to verifiable empirical evidence, thus transcending the rigid dichotomy between absolute relativism and naive positivism.

后现代主义通过瓦解启蒙时代对客观真理、线性进步与普世宏大叙事的信仰，从根本上动摇了传统历史编纂学。通过将历史记述重新定义为内在的文本建构而非现实的透明映照，学者们着重探讨了那些必然塑造档案解读的修辞策略与意识形态框架。这一认识论转向揭示了边缘化视角如何被主导性元叙事系统性地消音，从而迫使历史学家去审视知识生产与制度权力之间的内在纽带。因此，当代历史实践已转向一种批判性反思，它在严格承认叙事主观性的同时坚守可验证的经验证据，从而超越了绝对相对主义与天真实证主义之间的僵硬二元对立。